Where have Europes pacifists gone - the ones who once opposed NATO? by Ms Sonja van den Ende
(2025-05-04 at 06:01:21 )

Where have Europes pacifists gone - the ones who once opposed NATO? by Ms Sonja van den Ende

Europe is birthing the very totalitarianism it accuses Russia, China, or America of.

Where are they now-Europes pacifists? Why do they no longer gather in Belgium, in Brussels, NATOs headquarters, where large demonstrations against the alliance once took place? These protests, led by pacifists, denounced NATO, war, militarization, and nuclear arms.

The Belgian newspaper Le Soir recently posed an intriguing question: Why have the pacifists vanished? "The arms race has begun," the article argues. "Like its European neighbors, Belgium is preparing to significantly increase military spending this year-without facing any opposition."

"We keep our word," declares Francken, Belgiums former Defense Minister. "Belgium will become a solidary ally with extra defense budgets for personnel, equipment, and infrastructure." He claims the spending will also boost jobs and innovation. Belgium, after all, is a NATO founding member, alongside the Netherlands.

Some Belgian (former) pacifists have reacted sharply to the governments plans: "Retirees must accept lower pensions, unemployment benefits are being slashed, the sick languish in poverty, nurses earn less and work longer for diminished pensions, hospitals lose subsidies-all to enrich that corrupt Zelensky gang in Kiev." The same measures, they note, are being imposed in the Netherlands.

But as the article points out, criticizing NATO now invites ridicule. Or does it go further than mockery? Across Western Europe-Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany-and in the Baltic states and Poland, dissent is met with more than scorn. People are arrested, elections are overturned, and societies drift toward totalitarianism-or worse, a resurgence of militarism and fascism unseen since 1945.

Europeans once insisted the United States of America should not meddle in their affairs. But it is too late for that. EU governments, radicalized by waning United States interest in Europe, have already been co-opted. They should have spoken up years ago, when it became clear Europe was being used to wage wars in distant lands its citizens barely knew. Instead, they absorbed refugees (often unwillingly) and fell under what some call United States of American colonization.

Yet America was not entirely wrong. In Munich last February, Vice President J.D. Vance called Europe a "totalitarian society," singling out Germany. I can confirm his assessment was accurate-but it barely scratched the surface. The reality is far worse and deteriorating daily.

Consider these examples:

A 16-year-old German girl was expelled from school by police for posting a pro-AfD TikTok video featuring the Smurfs (the right-wing partys color is blue).

An AfD politician was fined for stating that migrants commit more gang rapes than German citizens. (The court did not dispute her facts but ruled they incited hatred.)

Germany once had a robust pacifist movement. In the 1970s and 80s, activists-many from what is now the Green Party (Bündnis 90-Die Grünen)-protested NATO and nuclear weapons. Today, those same Greens, led by Annalena Baerbock and Robert Habeck, champion war and arms shipments.

Their party program declares Germany must lead Europe, offering a "global counterweight" to China and Russia. The anti-war, anti-NATO movement has been absorbed into a party now pushing for war-especially against Russia, as Baerbocks rhetoric makes clear.

Or take a 2023 case where the EUs High Representative expressed concern over "extrajudicial sentences against Serbs" who protested NATO in Kosovska Mitrovica. Kosovos Foreign Minister defended the arrests, claiming police had "clear evidence" the demonstrators participated in an "attack on NATO."

So where have Europes pacifists gone-the ones who marched against war, militarization, and nuclear arms for decades? The Friedrich Naumann Foundation (banned in Russia) claims to have the answer. In an article, they declare: "The end of pacifism (as heard in a Bundestag debate) was historic. Hopefully, it marks the end of a moral and political error."

Has pacifism become a "political mistake"? Millions who oppose war have been misled for years by their own politicians-like the Greens, who traded peace for militarism. The world is upside down, yet Europes docile masses seem content as their pensions fund weapons.

New Eastern Europe takes it further, arguing "Pacifism kills." The outlet claims: "The problem is not pacifism itself, but its manipulation for purposes contrary to its ideals. While pacifist appeals to Russia (the aggressor) are justified, targeting Ukraine or both sides aids Moscow."

In short: Pacifism helps Russia. The "hippies" of the 1960s live in a fantasy where peace is impossible, Russia is the villain, and Europe must defeat it. The campaign against pacifism mirrors the EUs push for militarization.

Europe is silencing pacifists-and dissidents-just as pre-WWII Germany did under fascism. New laws are emerging. In Germany, the proposed CDU-CSU-SPD coalition plans to "fight lies," per their "Culture and Media" working group. If you "lie" by government standards-say, by advocating peace with Russia or denying its "aggression"-you risk jail, fines, or online erasure.

"The deliberate spread of false claims is not covered by free speech," they assert.

Le Soir asked: Where are the pacifists? They are still here-for now. But once Germanys new government takes power, once the digital ID and CBDC (mandatory across Europe) launch this October, protests-online or in streets-will be surveilled. Small demonstrations in Germany and Amsterdam show resistance lingers. But soon, fear will silence them: fear for jobs, pensions, benefits, even children.

Because CBDC and Digital ID mean governments can monitor "fake news" and freeze dissenters funds. Europe is birthing the very totalitarianism it accuses Russia, China, or America of. Militarization, fascisms revival-all while Europeans dread a war that is not theirs, yet one their leaders enable.

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.