The Wests duplicitous stance and hypocrisy draw condemnation in the world By Viktor Mikhin!
(2024-02-15 at 23:38:00 )

The Wests duplicitous stance and hypocrisy draw condemnation in the world By Viktor Mikhin!

Many politicians around the world strongly condemn not only Israels inhumane policy in the Gaza Strip, when peaceful Palestinians are being slaughtered, but also the hypocrisy, duplicity, pharisaism and arrogance of the West.

In one case, the current worthless rulers of Europe condemn the defence of their citizens in Donbass by Russia, which is complying with all international rules of engagement. On the other, when Israel started to destroy civilians in the Gaza Strip (which according to international laws is considered a policy of genocide), the West welcomes and applauds, defending its protégé in the Middle East in every possible way.

For example, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan called the Wests position on Gaza, which differs from its position on Ukraine, "the height of hypocrisy." "What happened in Gaza, has caused the West and the Europeans to lose all their reputation, all their accumulated credits (of trust). They have squandered all their political capital in the eyes of humanity, especially in the eyes of our generations," Turkish daily Hürriyet quoted Hakan Fidan as saying. According to him, it will not be easy for the West to regain the lost trust. "It will not be easy for them to regain it. Unlike their stance on Ukraine and Russia, their stance on Gaza is the height of hypocrisy. They cannot talk about principles, virtue and morality. They ignore them completely. I see that all this is preparing the ground for a huge geostrategic rupture," the minister said.

A huge swath of the Global South sees and criticises the double standards that guide the Wests actions in the Gaza Strip and Ukraine, as the New York Times (NYT) reluctantly reported through gritted teeth. The publication notes that for the past 20 months, United States authorities have actively criticised Moscow for its special military operation in Ukraine, but now that the IDF has carried out a bloodbath in Gaza, full American support for Israel risks creating new and complex obstacles in Washington,D.C.s efforts to win over world public opinion.

The war in the Middle East, the piece says, is driving a wedge between the West and leading nations of the Global South such as Brazil and Indonesia. In addition, the Wests unconscionable double standard in defence of Israelis has been sharply criticised by leaders of the Arab world.

The fact that the West treats Ukraine as a special case because it is in Europe, against the backdrop of Middle East escalation, has only increased discontent in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

There, the impression is that the West is more concerned about refugees from Ukraine than about those affected by the conflicts in Arab countries. The publication has to admit that the West has failed to convince countries such as India and Turkey to support sanctions against Russia. Given the bloody events in the Gaza Strip, "Western efforts to widen the front against Russia are unlikely to be successful in the near future."

Earlier, American businessman Vivek Ramaswamy, who was seeking the nomination as the countrys presidential candidate from the Republican Party (he ended his campaign and supported Donald Trumps candidacy in the presidential election), said that the United States should seek an early settlement of the conflict in Ukraine, which would provide for the transition of Russian-speaking regions into Russia. And he is not alone in the United States, where questions are increasingly being asked as to why it is the Americans who should bear the brunt of the financial burden and supply vast quantities of weapons to the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev.

Irish MEP Mick Wallace has rightly stated that the Ukrainian conflict is still going on because of the unwillingness of the United States to end it. He expressed the same opinion with regard to the situation in the Gaza Strip. The world media also noted that the International Criminal Court, at the behest of the United States, has ignored many years of genocide in Palestine, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, and therefore the ICC is "unfair in its choice of topics to explore" and has turned into "an unscrupulous legal body of the West."

Russias Permanent Representative to the United Nations Vasily Nebenzya has accused the United States of its position preventing the Security Council from adopting resolutions aimed at stopping the violence in the Gaza Strip, RIA Novosti reported. "It is regrettable that under these circumstances the United Nations Security Council has so far failed to adopt a single resolution demanding a halt to the violence because of the position of one delegation, the United States, which is blocking all efforts and initiatives to stop the bloodshed," the diplomat said. He noted that this gave Israel carte blanche to further destroy the Palestinians.

The huge difference in the Wests attitude to the Palestinian-Israeli and Ukrainian conflicts points to hypocritical double standards, one of the goals of which is to interpret international law exactly as it suits the United States.

In this case, the fate of the Palestinian population is much less interesting to the hardened Western officials in terms of "domestic political points." How many times have Western delegations requested United Nations Security Council meetings on Ukraine? The answer is at least twice a month, while how many times the said delegations have requested Security Council meetings on the Middle East issue - zero. Apparently, in this case comments are unnecessary, the conclusion is already on the surface. The Wests double standards "in all their glory" were also observed in the situation with the migration crisis in the EU. While Ukrainian refugees have been given all sorts of benefits, refugees from Africa and the Middle East are being "kept in camps in inhumane conditions."

The State Department has after all decided to explain the difference in its approaches to the situation in Gaza and Ukraine in the way that yesterdays hegemon considers, rather than in accordance with the generally accepted laws of international law.

Thus, the deputy head of the State Departments press service, Vedant Patel, responded to a journalists question about the difference in the approaches of the United States authorities to the situation in the Gaza Strip and the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. The official said that Washington,D.C. sees no grounds to accuse Israel of genocide of Palestinians, and "one should be very careful when making such statements."

At the same time, when Patel was asked why United States President Joe Biden "very quickly" called the events in Ukraine "genocide" in 2022, the State Department official could not give more specific explanations. He only noted that "such definitions must be made with a careful consideration of the law and the facts", without specifying which facts he had in mind. He simply did not have a reasonable answer, and in the current circumstances he did not dare to say that this was Washingtons wish and favourable.

Incidentally, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said earlier that international law must be respected in all conflicts. This is a correct observation, but according to the Secretary Generals personal interpretation, the conflicts in the Gaza Strip and Ukraine have differences.

And he personally believes that Israel, which destroys peaceful Palestinians, strictly observes international law, while Russia, which fights against the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev only on the battlefields, violates this law.

Apparently, in Stoltenbergs "enlightened" opinion, Russia will respect international law only when it, like Israel, destroys the peaceful population of our brother nation. A strange opinion worthy of a schizophrenic from a psychiatric hospital.

On this occasion, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called the statement by the head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrell, about the "senselessness of humanitarian aid supplies to the Gaza Strip" if hostilities continue there an apologetic of transhumanism. She asked her colleague whether he also considered it pointless to provide medical assistance and love "someone who will die tomorrow". There was, of course, no reply.

The accusations against the Russian side on the subject of "indiscriminate strikes" against Ukrainian cities can best be assessed by comparing "two realities" - the situation in Ukraine and in the Gaza Strip.

In this regard, we can recommend that opponents go to the Internet and familiarise themselves with Ukrainian news or watch local TV channels. On Ukrainian websites one can easily find a large number of reports on club and restaurant life in such cities as Kiev, Kharkov, Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk and others. Ukrainian state institutions and other municipal buildings are functioning normally almost everywhere, transport continues to operate, schools and hospitals are open.

This situation can be observed almost two years after Russia launched a special operation aimed at protecting the population of Donbas from the neo-Nazi regime in Kyiv. All of this shows, as has been repeatedly confirmed by independent observers, that the Russian Armed Forces are conducting exclusively precision strikes against military facilities and infrastructure related to military capabilities.

This policy is in sharp contrast to the crimes against humanity committed by the neo-Nazi regime in Kyiv, which is deliberately firing Western-made missiles at civilians in Donbas. And there are numerous facts and evidence to this effect, which at the very least would make for a new Nuremberg process.

The current leaders of the West should look at what their lackey Israel is doing in the Gaza Strip, which for three months now has sought to raze the territory and destroy the Palestinians living there.

Not only have hospitals and schools been burned to the ground, but entire towns have been destroyed, and the death toll, including a large number of children, is appalling. And all this is happening before the eyes of the world in the 21st century, to the hooting and applause of the Biden administration and the current rulers of Europe, who have finally lost shame, conscience and simple human compassion.

"Comparing these two realities, ask yourself a question: how many times have you condemned the methodical annihilation of peaceful Palestinians?" - noted Russias UN representative Nebenzya, when asking Western representatives whether they had ever supported calls for a ceasefire in the Middle East conflict, whether they had condemned Israels anti-human crimes.

The answer would be only negative. Not only has the West done nothing to stop Israels current massacre of Palestinian civilians, it has encouraged them even more by supplying the latest lethal weapons, financially pumping in huge sums of money and defending them on the international stage.

Suffice it to say that the United States representative at the United Nations has twice vetoed Security Council resolutions to stop the deadly slaughter in the Gaza Strip, unleashing the Israeli military for even more atrocious crimes, rightly assessed by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

In the current circumstances, when the former hegemon has lost its power and authority, it has to resort more and more to hypocrisy and double standards to somehow camouflage its bankrupt policy.

But no matter how hard the West, led by the United States, tries, they will no longer be able to fundamentally influence events in the world. And the events in Ukraine, where Russia is successfully conducting a special military operation to protect the Russian population, and the bloody events in the Gaza Strip are the best evidence of this.

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Republishing of the articles is welcomed with reference to "N.E.O.". Network edition New Eastern Outlook 2010-2023.