In Court Cases Facts Are Losing Their Relevancy as They Have in News Reporting, Scholarship, and Science by Paul Craig Roberts!
(2024-01-02 at 19:53:45 )

In Court Cases Facts Are Losing Their Relevancy as They Have in News Reporting, Scholarship, and Science by Paul Craig Roberts!

Informed people understand that the indictments, civil charges, and judicial rulings against Donald Trump all involve what is politely called "a stretch of the law." But they do not seem to grasp that Donald Trumps defense against the charges is not based on the falseness of the charges but on whether he has presidential immunity.

In other words, the phony charges stand, and the question is whether Donald Trump has presidential immunity. Whether the charges are factual is not considered relevant.

The advantage in Donald Trumps attorneys taking this approach is that if Donald Trump has immunity, all the indictments are dismissed and trials over the disputed charges do not take place, a good thing as the biases of the Democrat prosecutors, judges, and jurors make fair trials for Donald Trump impossible.

The disadvantage is that Donald Trumps enemies can claim that the charges are true but could not be brought to trial because of immunity.

More seriously, it means that the lack of evidentiary basis for the charges will not be established. In other words, the Democrat prosecutors who weaponized law in order to intentionally concoct false indictments are protected from having their crimes revealed.

Of course the Democrat juries and judges would validate the Democrat prosecutors cases despite the lack of evidence.

In the United States judicial system where truth is irrelevant, accusation alone serves as the basis for indictment and conviction.

As no defendant or defendants lawyer trusts the American judicial system, 97% of all alleged felonies are resolved with plea bargains in which even innocent defendants agree to a lessor charge in order to avoid the risk of a longer sentence imposed by a trial. Only the idealistically few expect a fair trial.

By declining the Justice (sic) Departments plea to fast-track an immunity decision, the Supreme Court has probably delayed any Donald Trump trial until after the election.

If the federal appeals court upholds Democrat district court judge Tanya Chutkans biased ruling against Donald Trump, then the appeal goes to the Supreme Court. It lengthens the ordeal that Donald Trump has to endure, but it likely frees him from campaigning with a false conviction hanging around his neck.

Paul Craig Roberts columns may be reprinted, disseminated, and translated on the condition that a link is provided to the articles on "Paul Craig Roberts" and that the following disclaimer is included:
~
Permission to reprint Dr. Roberts columns does not imply that Dr. Roberts endorses the websites or media organizations that republish his columns or that he approves of the content of the websites, media outlets or books that republish his columns.