Assange Is Not A Journalist!" Yes He Is, Idiot. by Caitlin Johnstone
(2019-04-27 at 12:11:29 )

"Assange Is Not A Journalist!" Yes He Is, Idiot. by Caitlin Johnstone

As we discussed yesterday, whenever Mr. Assange is in the news and people are defending him you always see a bunch of hyper-emotional empire loyalists running around online trying to manage the narrative about him.

One of the most common talking points which comes up is that Mr. Assange is "not a journalist".

The reason this talking point comes up, of course, is because the WikiLeaks founder is besieged by powerful forces who are attempting to imprison him for publishing inconvenient facts about them, and his defenders often voice their concerns about what this means for the future of press freedoms.

The completely baseless claim that Mr. Assange is "not a journalist" is used in an attempt to defuse the argument that his prosecution by the United States government could lead to the same fate for any news media outlet which publishes leaks on the United States government anywhere in the world.

If he is not a journalist, then his prosecution sets no precedent for real journalists.

This argument, if you can call it that, is fallacious for a number of reasons.

For starters, as The Intercepts Glenn Greenwald explained last year, there is not any legal distinction in the United States Constitution between news media outlets like the New York Times and an outlet which solely focuses on publishing leaks. If you set the precedent with any publisher, you are necessarily setting it for all of them. Greenwald writes the following:

-To begin with, the press freedom guarantee of the First Amendment is not confined to "legitimate news outlets" - whatever that might mean.

The First Amendment is not available only to a certain class of people licensed as "journalists."

It protects not a privileged group of people called "professional journalists" but rather an activity: namely, using the press (which at the time of the First Amendments enactment meant the literal printing press) to inform the public about what the government was doing.

Everyone is entitled to that constitutional protection equally: there is no cogent way to justify why the Guardian, ex-DOJ-officials-turned-bloggers, or Marcy Wheeler are free to publish classified information but Julian Assange and WikiLeaks are not.

Secondly, anyone with a functioning brain can see that Mr. Julian Assange is indeed a journalist.

Publishing facts so that the citizenry can inform themselves about what is going on in their world and what is happening with their government is the thing that journalism is.

Duh.

The need for an informed citizenry is the entire reason why press freedoms are protected so explicitly under the United States Constitution, and publishing facts about the most powerful institutions on earth indisputably does create a more informed citizenry.

You can look at any conventional dictionary definition of the word and come to the same conclusion. Merriam-Webster offers "the public press" and "the collection and editing of news for presentation through the media".

The Oxford English Dictionary offers "The activity or profession of writing for newspapers, magazines, or news websites or preparing news to be broadcast."

Your Dictionary offers " the work of finding, creating, editing and publishing news, or material written and presented for a newspaper, magazine or broadcast news source."

These are activities that WikiLeaks is undeniably involved in; they collect and publish newsworthy information to be circulated by themselves and other news sources.

The fact that they do their part differently (and better) than other outlets does not change that.

Which explains why the WikiLeaks team has racked up numerous awards for journalism over the years, including the Walkley Award for Most Outstanding Contribution to Journalism (2011), the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism (2011), the International Piero Passetti Journalism Prize of the National Union of Italian Journalists (2011), the Jose Couso Press Freedom Award (2011), the Brazillian Press Association Human Rights Award (2013), and the Kazakstan Union of Journalists Top Prize (2014).

The claim that Mr. Assange is "not a journalist" is both an irrelevant red herring and a self-evident falsehood.

It is made not by people with an interest in maintaining a small and specific linguistic understanding of what the word journalism means, but by people who want to see Julian Assange imprisoned by the same government which tortured Chelsea Manning because he made them feel emotionally upset.

It is a fact-free argument made entirely in bad faith for inexcusable motives: the desire to see a journalist imprisoned for telling the truth.

When someone says " Mr. Assange is not a journalist", they are not telling you what Mr. Assange is. They are showing you what they are.

Thanks for reading!! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

I recognize no copyright of any kind on this work. You have my unconditional permission to republish it or use any part of it in any way you like, or any of my other writings.